Linda Moulton Howe is an investigative journalist, documentary producer, author, and Earthfiles editor whose career moved from local television science and environmental reporting into cattle-mutilation, UFO, crop-circle, and alleged nonhuman-intelligence investigations.1 Earthfiles says she earned a Stanford master's degree in communication in 1968, received three regional Emmys and a national Emmy nomination, and was honored for medical and science production during WCVB-TV's station-level Peabody recognition.12 Her public importance comes from the way she assembled rancher, law-enforcement, witness, and anonymous-source accounts into a durable UFO narrative, while official and veterinary explanations often point toward predators, decomposition, inadequate evidence preservation, and weak chain of custody.34
Broadcast Career
Howe's own biography describes a pre-UFO documentary career focused on science, medicine, environmental pollution, alternative energy, and water contamination.1 The independent Peabody record confirms that WCVB-TV, not an individual producer, received a 1975 institutional Peabody for overall programming excellence across documentaries, investigative reporting, magazine formats, and public meetings.2 Earthfiles places Howe at KMGH-TV in Denver as Director of Special Projects and credits that period with public-health and environmental documentaries including Poison in the Wind, A Sun Kissed Poison, Fire in the Water, and A Radioactive Water.1 The station Peabody should therefore be separated from Howe's individual awards, because the Peabody record identifies WCVB-TV as the recipient while Earthfiles frames Howe as one of the station producers honored by that broader institutional award.12
A Strange Harvest
According to Earthfiles, Howe began investigating bloodless and trackless animal-mutilation reports in September 1979 after earlier environmental reporting in Colorado.1 Earthfiles says A Strange Harvest aired on KMGH-TV on May 25, 1980, drew the station's largest audience for a locally produced documentary, and earned Howe another regional Emmy.1 A separate Earthfiles film page describes A Strange Harvest as an Emmy-winning hour documentary about animal mutilations and states its thesis directly: Howe followed eyewitness testimony and linked the deaths to nonhuman intelligence and technology.5 HISTORY's overview similarly places Howe among researchers who connect cattle mutilations to extraterrestrial explanations and says her 1989 follow-up book concluded that extraterrestrials were likely involved.46
Official Record and Limits
The FBI Vault record shows that the Department of Justice authorized the FBI's Albuquerque office in March 1979 to investigate animal mutilations on Indian lands in New Mexico, after correspondence from Senator Harrison Schmitt described 15 cases over the prior three years.3 At an April 20, 1979 Albuquerque conference chaired by Schmitt, law-enforcement agencies, news media, and members of the public discussed theories that included satanic cults, predators, pranksters, extraterrestrial visitors, and an unknown government agency.3 The same FBI file records that, by January 15, 1980, investigator Kenneth Rommel had found no reported cases that appeared to involve mutilation by anything other than common predators and had received no information justifying belief in intentional human mutilation.3
HISTORY's cattle-mutilation overview gives the broader public context: Colorado alone reported nearly 200 cases between April and October 1975, ranchers and local officials disputed simple predator explanations, and the FBI ultimately closed its inquiry with a predator-centered conclusion.4 The same overview notes veterinary explanations involving scavenger preference for soft tissue, livor mortis producing a bloodless appearance, and a 1979 Washington County, Arkansas experiment in which a dead cow left outdoors developed damage resembling reported mutilation patterns.4 Those records do not disprove every rancher or law-enforcement observation collected by Howe, but they do mean her extraterrestrial interpretation remains an attributed conclusion rather than an official finding.3456
Books and Broadcasts
Google Books catalogs the 2014 second edition of An Alien Harvest: Further Evidence Linking Animal Mutilations and Human Abductions to Alien Life Forms as a 457-page Linda Moulton Howe Productions book, with an earlier 1989 edition also listed.6 The catalog description presents the book's claim as a non-fiction investigation arguing that medical, law-enforcement, and eyewitness evidence points to extraterrestrial biological entities as perpetrators, so the claim should be read as Howe's published thesis rather than as independently established fact.6 The New Mexico-Arizona Book Awards anniversary booklet lists An Alien Harvest by Linda Moulton Howe under the 2015 "Nonfiction - other" winners.7
Coast to Coast AM's 2019 announcement says Howe's monthly reports dated to 2003 with George Noory and 1991 with Art Bell, and that those segments carried her Earthfiles science, environment, and Real X-Files reporting to a national paranormal-radio audience.8 HISTORY's Ancient Aliens schedule devoted an August 30, 2024 episode, The Linda Moulton Howe Files, to her coverage of mysterious phenomena, showing that her work remains part of cable UFO and ancient-astronaut programming.9 Rotten Tomatoes metadata for the 2013 documentary Mirage Men describes a film about former government agents discussing their role in shaping Cold War UFO mythology, and its cast listing includes both Howe and Richard Doty.10
Assessment
Howe's strongest historical value is archival and journalistic: she recorded interviews, gathered case narratives, followed local officials and ranchers into a subject many mainstream outlets treated as marginal, and helped preserve a major strand of cattle-mutilation UFO folklore.1456 Her weakest evidentiary ground is causal: the leap from unusual carcass condition or witness testimony to nonhuman technology often depends on interpretation, anonymous sourcing, or disputed forensic readings rather than reproducible physical evidence.34610 A careful dossier therefore treats Howe as an influential claimant and documentarian, not as a source whose extraterrestrial conclusions can be accepted without independent corroboration.3456