Jeffrey Nuccetelli

Jeffrey Nuccetelli became a listed witness in the House Oversight hearing on Sept. 9, 2025, which focused on UAP transparency and whistleblower protection, and he submitted an official written statement for that session.¹²³

  Origin of claim chain

Nuccetelli’s public profile is rooted in the official hearing packet where he appears as a named witness and his testimony document is attached to the same event page.¹² The hearing was announced as a response to reporting failures and retaliation concerns, framing his appearance as part of a formal oversight chronology rather than a standalone media claim process.⁴⁵

  2025 hearing chronology

• 2025-09-03: the committee press release announced the hearing on transparency and whistleblower protection, establishing the session’s scope.⁴
• 2025-09-09: the hearing page shows Nuccetelli as a witness and links his written statement for that date.¹²
• 2025-09-09: the House hearing transcript package lists his oral statement among the official witness exhibits.⁶³
• 2025-09-09: the same-day wrap-up release reiterates the committee’s focus on whistleblower risk and transparency follow-up, with no additional correction text replacing the witness submissions as findings.⁷⁵

  Claim set under record

In his written submission, Nuccetelli states he served in the Air Force military police and reports five Vandenberg incidents between 2003 and 2005, including the 14 Oct 2003 event later known as the red-square case.² He adds that each reported case involved multiple witnesses and was documented internally before moving into the committee’s hearing record.²⁶ Nuccetelli also says Air Force records were held by AARO and the FBI, linking the claim to named federal repositories rather than private attribution alone.²⁶ His oral section in the hearing packet expands on the reporting-chain concern, including the claim of weak formal follow-through after escalation.⁶³

  Evidence posture after the hearing day

The source record tracks Nuccetelli as a sworn witness narrative within the hearing corpus, not a resolved adjudication of each event. The official materials preserve his testimony, the hearing context, and the committee policy framing without replacing it with a separate investigative verdict in public text at that time.¹³⁷

  References

  References

1. oversight.house.gov ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

2. oversight.house.gov ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶

3. oversight.house.gov ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

4. oversight.house.gov ↩ ↩²

5. oversight.house.gov ↩ ↩²

6. congress.gov ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

7. oversight.house.gov ↩ ↩²