Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

USS Nimitz Encounter

Sighting

Navy pilots from the USS Nimitz carrier group tracked tic tac-shaped craft performing impossible maneuvers

Witnesses — Navy pilots from the USS Nimitz carrier group

Evidence — Video

Status — Unresolved

Disclosure Rating — 5/10

On 14 November 2004 the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group operating about 100 nautical miles southwest of San Diego diverted two F/A-18F Super Hornets to investigate anomalous radar contacts.

Commander David Fravor, leading the section, reported a 40-foot white object that exhibited instantaneous acceleration, lacked visible control surfaces, and produced no sonic boom.1

Multiple sensors recorded data: the SPY-1B phased-array radar on USS Princeton tracked dozens of fast-moving objects, an E-2C Hawkeye confirmed airborne contacts, and Lt. Chad Underwood captured the 76-second FLIR1 infrared video later released by the Department of Defense.23

These records, together with sworn testimony from shipboard technicians, have made the incident a focal point of modern U.S. investigations into unidentified aerial phenomena.

  Personnel

NameRoleAffiliation
Cdr. David FravorCommanding officer, VFA-41; lead F/A-18F pilot who visually engaged objectUSS Nimitz
Lt. Cdr. Jim SlaightWeapon Systems Officer in Fravor's aircraftUSS Nimitz
Lt. Chad UnderwoodF/A-18F pilot who recorded FLIR1 videoUSS Nimitz
SCOS Kevin DaySenior Chief Operations Specialist; SPY-1B radar operatorUSS Princeton
FC2 Gary VoorhisAegis fire-control technician tracking returnsUSS Princeton
Lt. Cdr. Jason TurnerAir Control Officer aboard E-2C Hawkeye (VAW-117)Carrier Air Wing Eleven

  Timeline

Date & Time (PST)Event
10–13 Nov 2004SPY-1B radar logs >100 high-altitude objects dropping from 80,000 ft to sea level in <1 s and hovering.4
14 Nov 2004 12:00USS Princeton diverts Fravor and Slaight from training to a "real-world" intercept.5
14 Nov 2004 12:15Pilots observe turbulent patch of sea and a 40-ft "tic tac" 50 ft above the water; object reacts to fighter maneuver and departs in <2 s.5
14 Nov 2004 12:30Princeton reacquires target 60 nm away at CAP point within seconds of loss of visual.4
14 Nov 2004 13:00Second section launches; Lt. Underwood films FLIR1 video showing featureless oblong target rotating without heat plume.2
15–16 Nov 2004Air-wing intelligence officers collect flight data recorders; sailors report external technicians removing Aegis and CEC storage media.6
16 Dec 2017The New York Times publishes article with FLIR1 clip, bringing case to public attention.3
27 Apr 2020DoD officially declassifies FLIR1, GIMBAL, and GOFAST videos, affirming their authenticity.3

  Evidence

EvidenceDescriptionSource
Eyewitness testimonyPilots and radar operators describe oval object showing instantaneous acceleration and right-angle turns.15Multiple sworn interviews
SPY-1B radar tracksPhased-array radar captured altitude & speed changes that exceed known aircraft performance.4USS Princeton logs
E-2C Hawkeye dataAirborne early-warning crew confirmed target location enabling intercept.4VAW-117 mission tapes
FLIR1 infrared video76-second ATFLIR clip displays target without exhaust plume and apparent rotation.2DoD FOIA release
CEC/Aegis logsCooperative Engagement Capability network recorded tracks; media reportedly seized after event.6Crew statements
Sea disturbancePilots observed 100-m patch of frothing water as if large object submerged.5Visual report

  Assessment

Sensor correlation, pilot testimony, and publicly released video support that an unknown airborne object was present, moved rapidly, and interacted with carrier-group aircraft. The data set is richer than typical sightings and remains one of the Navy's best-documented cases.

Skeptical reviews note that FLIR1 may depict a distant jet and that radar anomalies can arise from software injection or clutter.7 The Office of the Director of National Intelligence concluded in 2021 that available evidence was insufficient to attribute extraordinary capabilities, urging release of additional telemetry.8

Without raw radar files or fused telemetry, the performance claims rest on observer interpretation. Further disclosure of classified sensor data would permit independent reconstruction of kinematics and determine whether the "tic tac" represented advanced human technology, a sensor artifact, or something not yet understood.

  References

  1. history.com 2

  2. navair.navy.mil 2 3

  3. nytimes.com 2 3

  4. youtube.com 2 3 4

  5. youtube.com 2 3 4

  6. youtube.com 2

  7. metabunk.org

  8. dni.gov

Occured on November 14, 2004

4 min read