DOW-UAP-PR22 is a Department of War PURSUE Release 01 video record for an unresolved UAP report associated with Syria. The public release pairs the clip with DoW-UAP-D16, the accompanying USCENTCOM mission report, and maps it to DVIDS video ID 1006060.12
Fourteen-Second Sensor Clip
DVIDS describes the record as 14 seconds of footage from infrared and electro-optical sensors aboard a U.S. military platform. The public description says that at the five-second mark, an object moves right to left across the upper-right quarter of the sensor field of view.23
The DVIDS page titles the media DOW-UAP-PR22, Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, July 2022, identifies AARO as the releasing unit, and provides the direct MP4 embedded above.23
USCENTCOM Sortie Details
The paired DoW-UAP-D16 PDF is a seven-page USCENTCOM MISREP declassified by MG Richard A. Harrison on October 8, 2025. It places the sortie under Operation Inherent Resolve in the air domain, with AFCENT as the major command, USCENTCOM as the combatant command, the 609th operations center listed, 89 ATKS as originator, and Armed Recce as the mission type.4
The mission narrative says Task Force Chosin tasked imagery intelligence at 301639ZJUL22, the aircraft departed Muwaffaq Salti Air Base at 301822ZJUL22, and the crew performed imagery and signals intelligence collection before returning to base. The UAP entry records initial contact at 310239:00ZJUL22, a friendly aircraft altitude of 19,359 feet, a friendly aircraft speed of 116 knots, and a UAP event that lasted less than one minute while moving north to south.4
What The Pairing Adds
The video alone is a short sensor excerpt with a limited visual description. Its paired mission report gives the clip operational context: tasking source, sortie timing, collection activity, friendly-aircraft state, location redactions, and the original reporter's brief UAP description.24
That pairing also shows the limits of the public record. The Department of War release describes the video for informational purposes only and warns readers not to treat the description as an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination about the event's validity, nature, or significance.12