D63 Strait of Hormuz Record
The Department of War's May 8, 2026 PURSUE Release 01 identifies DOW-UAP-D63 as a Department of War PDF mission report for an October 1, 2020 incident in the Strait of Hormuz.1 The release metadata describes the file as a Military Mission Report, or MISREP, a standardized U.S. military reporting form that services also use to submit UAP observations to AARO.1
The released PDF identifies the record as Misrep 4871281. Its visible administrative fields place the record in a USCENTCOM and AFCENT context, list the 482 ATKS as the originating unit, and show 609th operations-center fields; personnel, aircraft, tasking, and some operational details remain redacted.2
October 1 Sortie
The narrative says a redacted U.S. military platform took off from OKAS at 2249Z, handed over from the launch-and-recovery element at 2300Z, and supported NAVCENT for a redacted operation in the Arabian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, and Gulf of Oman.2 It records multiple GUARD calls across the mission before noting at 1829Z that the platform observed one UAP and directed readers to Observation Line 1.2
The same narrative says the platform was cleared to return to base at 1835Z, handed back to the launch-and-recovery element at 1922Z, and landed at OKAS at 1953Z.2 Its mission summary lists 21 mission hours, 17.3 IMINT hours, full-motion video exploited by DGS-1, and four total taskings prosecuted.2
The PURSUE description adds that a U.S. military operator reported observing a UAP, while cautioning that descriptive and estimative language reflects the reporter's subjective interpretation at the time rather than a conclusion about object features or performance.1
No D63 Video Pairing
The PURSUE metadata leaves both video pairing and PDF pairing blank for DOW-UAP-D63, so this entry has no identified paired PR media in the release metadata.1 The public record for this item is therefore the written mission report rather than a PDF-and-video pairing.12
Value and Limits
DOW-UAP-D63 matters because it preserves a contemporaneous military UAP report from a strategic maritime chokepoint, but the record itself is not an identification or investigative conclusion.12 Its evidentiary value is in provenance: the report ties the observation to mission timing, command context, sensor exploitation, location context, and redaction boundaries.2
Because the release provides no paired public PR media and the PDF withholds many operational details, the record supports cautious source-level analysis rather than claims about the object's origin, capabilities, or identity.12