Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

2022 Congressional Hearings Documentation

Transcript

Records and testimony from the first open U.S. congressional hearings on UAP since the 1960s

Disclosure Rating — 7/10

The House Intelligence Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation Subcommittee held an open hearing on unidentified aerial phenomena in May 2022.1

Defense officials Scott Bray and Ronald Moultrie presented declassified videos and answered lawmakers' questions about reporting procedures and national security.23

Transcripts and video are archived online for research.45678910

  Detailed timeline

Date & Time (ET)EventParticipants / MaterialsSource
2022-05-10 17:05Hearing notice for "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (Open and Closed)" published on committee repositoryHouse Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI)11
2022-05-17 09:00Open session convenes in HVC-210, Capitol Visitor CenterChair André Carson gavels in; ranking member Rick Crawford present211
2022-05-17 09:05Chairman Carson opening statement entered into recordPDF made public one week later12
2022-05-17 09:15Chairman Schiff opening statementPDF released with hearing record13
2022-05-17 09:20Testimony of Under Secretary Ronald S. MoultrieWritten statement & oral remarks14
2022-05-17 09:35Testimony of Deputy Director Scott W. Bray, ONIWritten statement, two de-classified UAP videos displayed1516
2022-05-17 10:28Open session adjourns; committee recesses17
2022-05-17 12:00Closed classified briefing begins in HVC-304Members only11
2022-05-24 12:29Official transcript and support documents posted116-page verbatim record of open hearing17

On 17 May 2022 the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation convened the first open congressional hearing on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) in more than fifty years.

Meeting in room HVC-210 of the Capitol Visitor Center, Members questioned Department of Defense and Intelligence Community leaders on how the government collects, vets, and disseminates reports of unexplained objects in restricted airspace.

    Background Discussed

Program/OrganizationYears/LegislationDescription
Project Blue Book1952–1970Last large-scale U.S. Government inquiry into UFO sightings.
Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP)2007–2012 (revealed 2017)Pentagon program investigating UAP, revealed by press exposés in 2017.
Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG)FY 2022 NDAA, Sec. 1683Created by Section 1683 of the FY 2022 NDAA to standardize collection and analysis of UAP incidents.

    Committee membership and witnesses

Committee MemberRole/Title
André CarsonChair, convened first UAP hearing since 1969
Adam SchiffRepresentative, requested 2021 ODNI UAP report
Rick CrawfordRepresentative (Ranking Member), emphasized counter-intel concerns
Peter WelchRepresentative, urged data-sharing transparency
Jim HimesRepresentative, queried sensor data & FAA links
Raja KrishnamoorthiRepresentative, pressed witnesses on "near misses"
Brad WenstrupRepresentative, highlighted flight-safety issues
Mike GallagherRepresentative, authored UAP reporting & whistleblower amendments
Mark GreenRepresentative, no notable UAP actions on record
Darin LaHoodRepresentative, asked about misinformation penalties
Ronald S. MoultrieUnder Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, oversaw AOIMSG
Scott W. BrayDeputy Director of Naval Intelligence, led UAP Task Force

Discussion in hearing:

  1. Receive an update on AOIMSG organization, staffing, and milestones
  2. Assess whether aviators and analysts can now report UAP encounters without stigma
  3. Understand DoD/IC plans for investigating sightings that remain unexplained
  4. Ensure Congress and the public get maximum transparency consistent with protection of sensitive sources and methods

  Key evidence and releases

The hearing produced the first publicly released congressional transcript on UAP since 1969, two de-classified Navy sensor videos (one spherical UAP fly-by, one triangular night-vision recording), high-resolution stills, and written statements from senior Defense intelligence officials.

Key PointDetails
AOIMSG Director & Office StatusDirector selected and office space assigned; full operational capability still pending.
UAP Database GrowthDatabase expanded to approximately 400 reports, primarily from military aviators after streamlined reporting procedures.
Near-Miss IncidentsEleven "near-miss" incidents acknowledged; no collisions or hostile acts confirmed.
DoD Analytic FrameworkFive-category framework for unresolved cases: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, U.S. developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, and "other."
Navy Videos PresentedTwo videos shown: a metallic sphere passing an F-18 cockpit, and triangular objects (later assessed as drones filmed through night-vision optics).
Evidence of Non-Terrestrial OriginWitnesses reiterated that no recovered materials or sensor data prove non-terrestrial origin, though a handful of events display flight characteristics not yet understood.
Interagency & International CollaborationCollaboration expanding with NASA, FAA, DHS, Space Force, and allied militaries to improve data sharing.

The committee repository archived all PDFs, permitting public scrutiny and academic citation. Subsequent media coverage on C-SPAN and major outlets embedded the footage, ensuring durable open-source availability for independent researchers.

    Discussion highlights

  • Members demanded a repeatable process to rule out U.S. classified platforms ("blue-on-blue" events).
  • Concerns raised over misinformation from private groups and the need for standardized public data releases.
  • Witnesses committed to balancing openness with national-security needs and to declassifying information where feasible.
  • Historical incidents such as the 2004 USS Nimitz encounter and reports from Malmstrom AFB were deferred to the closed session.

  Historic session

The House Intelligence Counterterrorism Subcommittee received testimony from Navy and intelligence leaders about UAP investigations. Lawmakers reviewed previously classified videos and asked about data-sharing with civilians.

  Released materials

The hearing produced transcripts, slides, and additional footage. While officials offered few definitive answers, the event signaled growing bipartisan interest in transparency.

  References

  1. congress.gov

  2. c-span.org 2

  3. nytimes.com

  4. thehill.com

  5. defense.gov

  6. docs.house.gov

  7. c-span.org

  8. defense.gov

  9. npr.org

  10. en.wikipedia.org

  11. docs.house.gov 2 3

  12. docs.house.gov

  13. docs.house.gov

  14. docs.house.gov

  15. docs.house.gov

  16. c-span.org

  17. docs.house.gov 2

Published on May 17, 2022

6 min read